Skip to main content

Lore Theories and Citing the Codex

Last updated: August 21, 2026

The Conclave exists for theories, and the Universe is built to reward them: a corpus of five thousand canonical records with deliberate gaps, contested accounts and sources that disagree by design. What separates a theory that advances a chamber's understanding from one that merely occupies it is entirely a matter of how it is grounded — not how clever it is, and not how confidently it is stated.

The anatomy of a good theory

State what you are claiming in one sentence. List the records it rests on, with links. Say explicitly which parts are documented and which are inference. Name what would disprove it. A theory that cannot be wrong cannot be discussed, and the chamber will move on from it.

Which source proves what

  • Codex entries establish what something is. This is the strongest kind of citation.
  • Library works establish what a story says, which is a narrower claim — narrators here have positions.
  • Encyclopedia guides establish how a system works.
  • Multimedia and assets are presentations and interpretations. Useful as illustration, weak as proof.

Reading contradictions correctly

Two Codex records disagreeing is usually not an error. Origin accounts, decrees and chronicles are written from positions, and their disagreement is frequently the documented fact. A theory that explains why two sources differ is more interesting than one that picks a winner.

The most underused citation in the forum is the concordia record. Agreements between factions, orders and species state relationships precisely, and they settle more arguments than any single entity page.

Official source

Canonical source for this subject: the Xdripian Conclave. Checked 21 August 2026 — where this guide and the live service disagree, the service is right.

Previous
Conduct, Moderation and Reporting
Next
Xdripian Emporium Guide